Current:Home > reviewsEchoSense:This Social Security plan will increase taxes, and Americans want it -GrowthSphere Strategies
EchoSense:This Social Security plan will increase taxes, and Americans want it
NovaQuant Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-09 16:52:22
Social Security's trust funds are EchoSenseexpected to be depleted in 2034, according to a recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report. This could lead to substantial benefit cuts if the government doesn't find a way to increase the program's funding. But finding a solution most people can agree on isn't easy.
Some have proposed raising Social Security payroll taxes. This would leave workers with less money to spend today or save for their futures, so it's understandably unpopular with a lot of people. But there's another tax-increasing reform that's actually gotten a lot of support from people in both political camps.
It would make the wealthy pay more
Most people pay Social Security payroll taxes on all of their income each year, but this isn't the case for high earners. In 2024, only the first $168,600 a person earns is subject to these taxes. Anything over this amount is not, but it also doesn't help increase your Social Security benefit in retirement.
Many believe that these high earners should pay more in Social Security taxes to help sustain the program. Some have argued for doing away with the ceiling on Social Security payroll taxes altogether, forcing everyone to pay the 12.4% tax — split evenly between employee and employer — on all their wages.
There's another proposal that suggests carving out a "donut hole," if you will, that would eliminate Social Security payroll taxes for those over the $168,600 ceiling (which is itself adjusted for inflation annually) and then implement it again for those with annual wages over $400,000.
For example, if this system were in place today, someone earning $200,000 per year would only pay taxes on the first $168,600 they earned. The remaining $31,400 wouldn't be subject to the Social Security payroll tax. If someone earned $450,000, they would pay Social Security payroll taxes on their first $168,600 and on the $50,000 over the $400,000 mark.
A recent University of Maryland study looked at the opinions of adults in six key swing states in the 2024 election, and found that a majority of them were strongly in favor of this option. Overall, 87% supported this idea, and the percentages in favor were pretty close among Republicans, Democrats and Independents. But that doesn't mean it's going to happen.
How this would affect Social Security
This reform would have a significant effect on Social Security's future, but it wouldn't be enough to ensure its future solvency. The survey revealed that if it were enacted, it would reduce the funding shortfall by about 60%. So at best, this would just kick the problem down the road a little way.
To ensure Social Security's stability for decades to come, the government would have to do more. There's likely no one solution that would fix the problem. It's probably going to come down to a combination of strategies that either increase the program's funding or reduce the benefits payable to retirees, disabled workers, surviving spouses and their families.
Therein lies the reason no one has come up with a magic fix for Social Security yet. The "donut hole" approach to Social Security payroll taxes appeals to a lot of people because it's not going to cause the average worker any financial hardship. But that's not the case for a lot of the other proposals on the table.
Increasing the Social Security payroll tax rate would leave workers with less money to spend today. Raising the full retirement age (FRA), as some have suggested, would essentially act as a benefit cut, because workers would face steeper early claiming penalties than applicants do now. Reducing benefits would also compromise the financial security of many retirees.
So there aren't easy answers. But the government has to decide on something within the next few years. When it does, we will all have to take a hard look at our retirement plans and adjust accordingly. The best thing workers can do right now is to save what they can on their own, so they're less dependent on Social Security in retirement.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
veryGood! (954)
Related
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Ranking
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Recommendation
Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds